Crown
i do not share the belief in fictions, the false premise man kind of the legal society relies upon: that of the existence of Crown, a Corporation sole, an abstract concept, the absolute owner of land in England and Wales (also concepts and not an actual mass on earth), it is an artificial construct, a device from the imagination of man, it does not exist; see fraud;
Acts are devised and authored by man kind, then copyright is vested in His Majesty, and licensed; how is this possible when Crown is an abstract concept;
authority cannot be derived from an imaginary device, it is a claim made by a man; fiction cannot act, express, experience, or do a deed; there are no fictions on earth;
William Blackstone explained that artificial persons are devised for the purposes of society and government, called corporations or bodies politic; what non sense; today, legal persons are deemed to be an entity or body having an existence separate and distinct from the persons that comprise them; how is that even possible, see fraud;
Edmund S. Morgan observed that: “The success of government thus requires the acceptance of fictions, requires the willing suspension of disbelief, requires us to believe that the emperor is clothed even though we can see he is not.”; and “In order to be viable, in order to serve its purpose, whatever that purpose may be, a fiction must bear some resemblance to fact. If it strays too far from fact, the willing suspension of disbelief collapses.”;
i do not suspend disbelief; i discern that which is real from fiction, and do not accept imagination, abstraction, or fiction as reality;
if thou does choose to represent a fiction of law, it is thy choice, however, i consider it mistake to compel man to act accordingly; i ask, is it thy intention to force thy beliefs, deceit, and licenses upon others;
name
i did abandon the Crown/implied title and surname A.D. December 2025, which is on record at https://notice.wales; i have use of a name, but i am not it; i can not identify with fiction, example: UK Citizen, UK resident, British Citizen/Subject; man cannot be a person, only appear as or in person;
dominion
when a man seizes to his use that which once lay in common, dominion once established, remains with him until by some other deed he shows his intention to abandon it;
i have dominion where i have possession, use, enjoyment, disposal and exclusion over a thing, all without control, diminution or interference by another man, and i know of no other claim; dominion arises by way of occupancy in the absence of another man's dominion and ceases upon abandonment; it is free of wrong doing in its origin;
i have dominion over my body, my stuff and my place; i uphold dominion and move freely on earth without control, diminution or interference by another man;
to interfere with dominion is a wrong, and a remedy must be available at law to both restore dominion, and to provide a remedy for wrong doing; out of wrong doing, no claim can arise;
rights
rights are another illusion; when a man does a deed that interferes with the dominion of another man, it is either agreeable or mistake, which without remedy, might become wrong or even trespass;
framework
man
man names the one who does the deed, answers, claims, or is wronged; it does not name an office, mask, capacity, corporation, legal character, or thing; man kind names living men and women as a kind, especially where man kind is treated as saleable, billable, tradeable, or an instrument of gain;
deed and deed due
a deed is the thing done by a man; in this framework it is communication or physical doing; a deed due is the thing owing to be done by agreement or remedy; first name the deed, then ask whether the deed ought not be done, or whether the deed due was not done;
wrong
wrong is either a deed done that ought not be done, or a deed due that is not done; the wrong is found in the deed itself, or in the non-doing of the deed due; hurt, damage, and loss are results caused by wrong, not the wrong itself; not every wrong necessarily produces a measurable result;
kinds of wrong
- communication
- by pressure: menace, duress, compulsion, and extortion, where threat, warning, warrant, keeping, cage, manacles, penalty, pressure, or office is used to drive surrender, attendance, answer, custody, or advantage;
- by deceit: fraud by false statement or claim, false naming or character, or hiding something; lie, slander, perjury, false claim, false description, personating, concealment, misdirection, vexation, and barratry;
- physical doing
- against man: interference with movement, hindrance or let, force, assault, battery, wounding, maim, restraint, bondage, durance, and imprisonment, where the body, movement, answer, remedy, or course of a man is crossed, blocked, held, bound, or confined;
- against dominion: interference with dominion, hindrance or let to use or enjoyment, force against a thing, breach of close, taking, theft, reaving, robbery, man-stealing, use without agreement, and meddling with another man's thing;
- making merchandise of man kind
- making merchandise, traffic, selling, setting to price, commodity, profit, and gain, where man kind, body, custody, attendance, process, surrender, name, or account is used as trade or advantage;
- deed due not done
- withholding deed due, debt, remedy withheld, answer withheld, release withheld, correction withheld, and settlement withheld;
result and remedy
the results caused by wrong, if any, are hurt, damage, and loss; not every wrong necessarily produces a measurable result; a threatening communication may itself be wrongful even where no hurt, damage, or loss follows; hurt is adverse change to the body of a man; damage is adverse change to a thing; loss is deprivation of something previously possessed, enjoyed, exercised, available, or expected by agreement; remedy due is the deed now owing because of the wrong: cease, correct, release, answer, withdraw, give the deed due, or make good hurt, damage, and loss;
